Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Australian Security Worker
 
  Return to Website Recent Posts HomeHelpSearchLoginRegisterBroadcast Message to Admin(s)  
 
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Sureguard Security Pty Ltd (Read 1913 times)
Reply #2 - 22. Feb 2018 at 09:30

Administrator   Offline
Administrator
Dob in a Dodgy Operator
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 996
*****
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
A transcript of that update:

Quote:
A PERTH security company that underpaid staff by more than $200,000 offered nothing but a “lame excuse” for its actions.

Rockingham-based Sureguard Security Pty Ltd received a $81,270 penalty in the Federal Court as a result of legal action by the Fair Work Ombudsman.

The company also back-paid 22 security guards $205,408 — wages that had been underpaid between December 2014 and January 2016.

Underpayments of individual workers ranged from $227 to a staggering $20,174.

Fair Work inspectors found Sureguard guards — including 13 who performed permanent night work — were paid flat hourly rates of between $21.50 and $24 for static guard work and $25 for patrol work.

Justice Barker said there was no real excuse for the underpayments, even if they were unintentional.

The company had argued the workers were not “vulnerable” and so nothing had prevented them from speaking up about the underpayments.

“[Sureguard’s] suggestion that its relevant employees were ‘not third world workers’ and so cannot be classed as ‘vulnerable workers’ is, in my view, only of passing relevance,” Justice Barker said.

“Fair work conditions are not created on the basis that an employer can opt out of complying with them if it considers it has a pliant workforce.

“There are a myriad of reasons why employees may not object to or make complaints about their terms and conditions and the satisfaction of award rates.

“It does not necessarily mean they are not vulnerable and are not concerned about under-award payments. In this case, casual employees were particularly at risk.”

Justice Barker also ordered Sureguard put workplace relations training in place for its managers.

Fair Work Ombudsman Natalie James noted the company’s director had sold personal assets “of high sentimental value” to repay staff as the company was facing financial difficulties due to a loss of contracts, instead of simply liquidating the company to avoid paying up.

“Credit is due for the director’s actions in paying the workers the money owed to them,” she said.

But she said ignorance of the law was no excuse for underpaying workers.

“We have been highlighting the issue of payment of flat rates leading to underpayments of security guards for a number of years now,” Ms James said.

“The outcome of this matter sends a clear message to security industry employers that claiming ignorance of this issue as an excuse for underpaying workers simply won’t wash.”

The company has since increased the wages of remaining employees as well as introducing strategies to stop the problem happening again, such as employing a bookkeeper “to ensure that employment standards are met.”

The Fair Work Ombudsman’s online tools and resources can also assist employers to determine their applicable Award, as well as classification and pay rates, allowances, overtime and penalty rates.
 

Ah! Working in Security where finding the real thief could be your employer. Now is the time to check your super account.
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - 22. Feb 2018 at 08:37

Warlord   Offline
High Level Contributor
Workers Unite

Posts: 45
****
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
 
IP Logged
 
30. May 2017 at 17:59

dreadman   Offline
High Level Contributor
Security Service Industry
Award 2010, I cant even.

Posts: 415
****
Alert Board Moderator about this Post! 
Perth security company allegedly underpaid guards $200,000

Quote:
9 March 2017

A Perth security company is facing Court for allegedly underpaying its guards more than $200,000.

The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Sureguard Security Pty Ltd, based at Rockingham, alleging it underpaid 22 security guards a total of $205,408 between December, 2014 and January, 2016.

The Fair Work Ombudsman conducted a self-initiated audit of Sureguard Security in October, 2015 as part of proactive campaign in Perth’s southern suburbs.

It is alleged that Fair Work inspectors found that guards were paid flat hourly rates of between $21.50 and $24 for static guard work and $25 for patrol work.

It is alleged that this led to the workers being variously underpaid their minimum hourly rates, casual loadings, overtime pay and penalty rates for night, weekend and public holiday work under the Security Services Industry Award.

The Fair Work Ombudsman claims 13 of the guards worked permanent night shifts.

Alleged underpayments of individual workers range from $227 to $20,174.

Fair Work Ombudsman Natalie James says the significant size of the underpayments and the failure to rectify the matter were key factors in the decision to commence litigation.

The company faces maximum penalties of up to $54,000 per contravention for several alleged contraventions of workplace laws.

The Fair Work Ombudsman is also seeking Court orders for the company to back-pay the workers in full and to commission workplace relations training for its managers.

An injunction restraining Sureguard Security from underpaying workers in future is also being sought. If the injunction is granted, the company could face contempt of court proceedings for any further underpayment contraventions proven in court.

A directions hearing is scheduled in the Federal Court in Perth on 3 March.

Ms James says payment of flat rates leading to underpayments of guards is a persistent problem in the security industry and improving compliance in the industry will continue to be a focus for the Fair Work Ombudsman.


Source:https://www.fairwork.gov.au/about-us/news-and-media-releases/2017-media-releases...
 

"The opposite for courage is not cowardice, it is conformity. Even a dead fish can go with the flow." - Jim Hightower
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print